SPJIMR
TASIC

The real-world research impact gap

The global management academy is reassessing how research excellence is defined, executed and evaluated. Changing expectations from societal stakeholders, alongside revised accreditation standards and impact frameworks from global bodies, mean business schools are increasingly required to demonstrate the tangible, real-world relevance and value of their intellectual contributions.

A growing body of literature argues that traditional scholarly indicators, while indispensable for verifying baseline validity, methodological rigour and theoretical advancement, are incomplete for business schools seeking to demonstrate broader relevance, legitimacy and value beyond the academic community (Barnett, 2026; Rosemann et al., 2021; Wickert et al., 2021). When academic discourse becomes too insular, it risks decoupling from the practitioners and policymakers it aims to inform.

Multi-dimensional research impact frameworks offer a starting point for understanding and bridging this gap. One such framework proposes that scholarly insights and output can create one or more of nine types of impact: two academy-centric, and seven that focus outside the academy.

Explore past editions

TASIC 2026

TASIC 2026

Know more
TASIC 2026

TASIC 2025

Know more

Academy-centric impact

Academic impact: Through traditional peer-reviewed contributions that advance theory.

Educational impact: Through case research and other pedagogical contributions that advance teaching effectiveness in MBA curricula and executive education.

Explore insights
TASIC 2026 Insights
How can businesses meet rising consumer aspirations while ensuring that growth remains responsible, inclusive and sustainable?
Know more →
White paper 2025
From Intent to Action: Steering Sustainable Consumption Choices
Read the full article →

Outside-academy impact

Regulatory and policy impact

By informing public policy, statutory frameworks, governmental guidelines, legislation or professional standards.

Organisational impact

Through direct application to the management, governance, strategic direction, operational models or overall performance of commercial, public and non-profit enterprises.

Technological impact

By enabling new technological capability, artefact development, systems design, digital infrastructure adoption or technical standards.

Entrepreneurial impact

By enabling entrepreneurial opportunity, start-up incubation and venture creation.

Economic impact

By improving sustainable economic value, regional productivity, wealth creation and shared prosperity.

Community and societal impact

By contributing to the well-being, equity, financial inclusion and overall quality of life of individuals, local communities or civil society.

Environmental impact

By enhancing environmental sustainability, resource stewardship, carbon reduction, circular economy practices or climate resilience.

While business schools have historically optimised for academy-centric impact, the ultimate test of a school's public value, and the social legitimacy of management research, is its capacity to drive the seven dimensions of outside-academy impact.

Press

Slaying the dragons of inaction

Slaying the dragons of inaction

SPJIMR’s TASIC 2026 catalyses dialogue on responsible growth

SPJIMR’s TASIC 2026 catalyses dialogue on responsible growth

SPJIMR hosts Technology and Societal Impact Conference (TASIC) 2025 — sparks dialogue on ‘wise innovation’

SPJIMR hosts Technology and Societal Impact Conference (TASIC) 2025 — sparks dialogue on ‘wise innovation’

Contact information

Email: tasic_acad@spjimr.org

Location: SPJIMR Mumbai
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan Campus
Munshi Nagar, Dadabhai Road
Andheri West, Mumbai – 400058